NINTH CIRCUIT ASKED TO REVIVE DISNEY’S “INSIDE OUT” LAWSUIT

As previously reported in “In The Know” on March 15, 2018, the plaintiff Denise Daniels (“Daniels”) lost the case involving the Disney movie “Inside Out” on a motion to dismiss.

On August 24, 2018, Daniels filed her opening brief asking the Ninth Circuit to revive her copyright infringement lawsuit, warning that the case will set a “dangerous precedent.” In Daniels’ opening appellate brief she asked the court to overturn the previous dismissal order finding against the plaintiff on her claim that “Inside Out” stole characters from her “Moodsters” collection- which include stuffed animals, story books and movies. The court previously found that Daniels’ characters “did not qualify for the kind of stand-alone copyright protection afforded to James Bond or Godzilla.” But in the opinion of this author, the court failed to consider the use by defendants of multiple elements in combinationSeeDeath of Copyright 3: The Awakening, (www.LoweLaw.com or https://files.acrobat.com/a/preview/36c5476e-8675-4f57-820b-9f445d893a92)

Daniels’ company, The Moodsters, sued Disney last summer over “Inside Out,” which grossed more that $850 million at box offices worldwide.

The case is Daniels et al. v. The Walt Disney Co. et al., case number 18-55635, in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

* Lowe & Associates (“The Firm”) is a boutique entertainment and business litigation firm located in Beverly Hills, California. The Firm has extensive experience handling cases involving entertainment law, having provided top quality legal services to its clients since 1991. The Firm is recognized in multiple publications for its many achievements and high ethical standards, including Martindale-Hubbell and Super Lawyers.

Find us at our website at www.LoweLaw.com

You may also like…

Original ‘Road House’ Writer Sues Amazon Over Remake

Original ‘Road House’ Writer Sues Amazon Over Remake

On February 27, 2024, the writer of the 1989 film ‘Road House’ sued Amazon Studios, LLC, in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. R. Lance Hill, also known as David Lee Henry, alleges that Amazon ignored his copyright for the screenplay and rushed to finish the film by using artificial intelligence before he was able to complete the termination of his original assignment to United Artists under Section 203 of the Copyright Act.

Defend Your Creative Legacy

In the realm of entertainment, your creative property isn’t just a product, it’s a piece of your soul, a testament to your passion, dedication, and vision.

At Lowe & Associates, we understand that, and we’re here to fiercely protect what’s rightfully yours. If you find yourself needing to defend your intellectual property, don’t stand alone. Team up with experts who have consistently showcased their ability to champion creative rights against all odds.

Are you ready to fight for your creative property?

Reach out to us today and let’s ensure your legacy remains untarnished.