On March 12, 2019, the Ninth Circuit denied Dan Aykroyd’s Crystal Head Vodka company’s request to be reimbursed $4.3 million in attorneys’ fees, after winning a lawsuit against a competing brand of vodka that had utilized the look and feel of the Crystal Head brand.

The Ninth Circuit affirmed that Globefill Inc., the maker of Crystal Head Vodka, is owed $872,000 in disgorgement of profits after a jury found its competitor Elements Spirits Inc., and founder Kim Brandi, stole Crystal Head’s bottle design for its KAH Tequila. The court explained they correctly denied Globefill’s  $4.3 million in attorneys’ fees, $13 million in disgorgement of profits and a bid to add tequila manufacturer Finos as another judgment debtor, as the case isn’t “exceptional,” which finding is required in order to award attorneys’ fees in a trademark infringement case.

“The district court did not abuse its discretion in concluding that this case was not ‘exceptional,’” the Ninth Circuit said. “In so concluding, the district court did not err in giving substantial weight to Brandi and Elements’ reasonable litigation positions while still considering the totality of the circumstances, including their intentional or willful infringement.”

In September 2017, a California federal judge granted a U.S. sales ban on KAH Tequila and more than $870,000 in disgorgement of profits to Globefill, despite the company’s request for $13 million.

U.S. District Judge Consuelo B. Marshall’s denial of the the company’s request for $4.3 million in attorneys’ fees was justified under a standard laid out by the Supreme Court in the 2014 Octane Fitness case; that standard says the winning party in a patent case can recover fees from “exceptional” cases, and that Globefill’s case doesn’t qualify as “exceptional.”

Globefill is represented by David Berg and Zenobia Harris Bivens of Berg & Androphy and Hernan D. Vera of Bird Marella Boxer Wolpert Nessim Drooks Lincenberg & Rhow PC.

Elements is represented by Thomas G. Rafferty and Keith R. Hummel of Cravath Swaine & Moore LLP and James M. Lee of LTL Attorneys LLP.

Brandi is represented by Jon Miller of Miller Johnson Law.

The case is Globefill Inc. v. Elements Spirits Inc. et al., case number 17-56574, in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

* Lowe & Associates (“The Firm”) is a boutique entertainment and business litigation firm located in Beverly Hills, California. The Firm has extensive experience handling cases involving business, entertainment law and intellectual property, having provided top quality legal services to its clients since 1991. The Firm is recognized in multiple publications for its many achievements and high ethical standards, including Martindale-Hubbell and Super Lawyers.

Find us at our website at

You may also like…

Original ‘Road House’ Writer Sues Amazon Over Remake

Original ‘Road House’ Writer Sues Amazon Over Remake

On February 27, 2024, the writer of the 1989 film ‘Road House’ sued Amazon Studios, LLC, in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. R. Lance Hill, also known as David Lee Henry, alleges that Amazon ignored his copyright for the screenplay and rushed to finish the film by using artificial intelligence before he was able to complete the termination of his original assignment to United Artists under Section 203 of the Copyright Act.

Defend Your Creative Legacy

In the realm of entertainment, your creative property isn’t just a product, it’s a piece of your soul, a testament to your passion, dedication, and vision.

At Lowe & Associates, we understand that, and we’re here to fiercely protect what’s rightfully yours. If you find yourself needing to defend your intellectual property, don’t stand alone. Team up with experts who have consistently showcased their ability to champion creative rights against all odds.

Are you ready to fight for your creative property?

Reach out to us today and let’s ensure your legacy remains untarnished.