Pepsi Finally Prevails in the 2016 Copyright Lawsuit Over Superbowl 50 Ad “The Joy of Dance”

On May 21st, 2021, a panel of judges from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held that PepsiCo (“Pepsi”) did not steal an advertising firm’s idea for a Super Bowl ad that aired in 2016.

During Superbowl 50, Pepsi aired an ad entitled “The Joy of Dance,” which featured singer Janelle Monae dancing to a trio of pop hits in period-appropriate costumes. After the ad aired during Superbowl 50, a Connecticut-based ad agency known as Betty Inc. (“Betty”) filed a lawsuit against the beverage giant alleging that the Pepsi commercial originated from the agency’s idea for a decades-spanning tour of American culture set to Pepsi’s theme song. Unfortunately for Betty, the Second Circuit panel of judges held that agency Betty’s pitch for an ad exploring popular music and fashion shifts across decades was too broad and generic to warrant copyright protection. As a result, the May 21st decision ended the long-running dispute over the Super Bowl 50 ad.

Betty is represented by Mark Scott Gregory of Martin LLP.

Pepsi is represented by Elizabeth Lafferty, Natalie Sue Richer and Scott Richard Samay of Lerner David Littenberg Krumholz & Mentlik LLP, and Michael S. Elkin of Winston & Strawn LLP.

The case is Betty Inc. v. PepsiCo Inc., case number 20-891, in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

* Lowe & Associates (“The Firm”) is an entertainment and business law firm located in Beverly Hills, California. The Firm has extensive experience handling cases involving copyright law, having provided top-quality legal services to its clients since 1991. The Firm is recognized for its many achievements, including successfully litigating many high-profile cases.

Find us at our website at

You may also like…

Original ‘Road House’ Writer Sues Amazon Over Remake

Original ‘Road House’ Writer Sues Amazon Over Remake

On February 27, 2024, the writer of the 1989 film ‘Road House’ sued Amazon Studios, LLC, in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. R. Lance Hill, also known as David Lee Henry, alleges that Amazon ignored his copyright for the screenplay and rushed to finish the film by using artificial intelligence before he was able to complete the termination of his original assignment to United Artists under Section 203 of the Copyright Act.

Defend Your Creative Legacy

In the realm of entertainment, your creative property isn’t just a product, it’s a piece of your soul, a testament to your passion, dedication, and vision.

At Lowe & Associates, we understand that, and we’re here to fiercely protect what’s rightfully yours. If you find yourself needing to defend your intellectual property, don’t stand alone. Team up with experts who have consistently showcased their ability to champion creative rights against all odds.

Are you ready to fight for your creative property?

Reach out to us today and let’s ensure your legacy remains untarnished.