On August 7, 2018, U.S. District Judge Stephen Wilson granted summary judgment in favor of StubHub over allegations that StubHub breached the Defend Trade Secrets Act (“DTSA”) when they hired three employees from a startup company who allegedly used proprietary data from their former company for apps they developed for StubHub.

Judge Wilson explained that plaintiff Calendar Research LLC failed to prove that the apps developed by their former employees contained the same code or other similarities to “Klutch,” the mobile app created for StubHub by the three former employees.

Judge Wilson further stated: “Based on the evidence before the court, and upon that record alone, there is no genuine dispute of material fact that the Klutch code is not a protectable trade secret, even as a compilation…The court is not ruling here that Klutch code could never be a protectable trade secret, or even that some compilation in the code is not protectable; however, the court finds that based on the information before it, there is no dispute that of material fact that the relevant parts of the code here were not protectable and that plaintiff has not shown any novel compilation beyond mere speculation based on those facts.”

The case is Calendar Research LLC v. StubHub Inc. et al., case number 2:17-cv-04062, in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California.

* Lowe & Associates (“The Firm”) is a boutique entertainment and business litigation firm located in Beverly Hills, California. The Firm has extensive experience handling cases involving entertainment law, having provided top quality legal services to its clients since 1991. The Firm is recognized in multiple publications for its many achievements and high ethical standards, including Martindale-Hubbell and Super Lawyers.

Find us at our website at

You may also like…

Original ‘Road House’ Writer Sues Amazon Over Remake

Original ‘Road House’ Writer Sues Amazon Over Remake

On February 27, 2024, the writer of the 1989 film ‘Road House’ sued Amazon Studios, LLC, in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. R. Lance Hill, also known as David Lee Henry, alleges that Amazon ignored his copyright for the screenplay and rushed to finish the film by using artificial intelligence before he was able to complete the termination of his original assignment to United Artists under Section 203 of the Copyright Act.

Defend Your Creative Legacy

In the realm of entertainment, your creative property isn’t just a product, it’s a piece of your soul, a testament to your passion, dedication, and vision.

At Lowe & Associates, we understand that, and we’re here to fiercely protect what’s rightfully yours. If you find yourself needing to defend your intellectual property, don’t stand alone. Team up with experts who have consistently showcased their ability to champion creative rights against all odds.

Are you ready to fight for your creative property?

Reach out to us today and let’s ensure your legacy remains untarnished.