On January 8, 2019, the U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments regarding whether copyright owners must completely register their works before filing a lawsuit. Several justices seemed skeptical of a claim that authors should be allowed to sue immediately after applying for a registration.

The argument came by way of a case brought by Fourth Estate Public Benefit Corp., a journalism organization that is pushing for the justices to rule that authors can sue after they file an application for registration. Arguments were made over what lawmakers meant when they said a copyright must be “registered” before a lawsuit is filed. Some circuit courts say a work is registered as soon as an author applies for it, but others say the government must actually complete the application process before an author can sue.

Justice Stephen Breyer asked, “Do you drive without a driver’s license when yours has expired because you wrote in to the registry of motor vehicles but they haven’t yet licensed you? Can you change your sewer in the house with a man who has not gotten the approval from the local public health authority?”

Fourth Estate responded by stating: ““registration” is an action taken by the copyright owner rather than by the Copyright Office, meaning the requirement is met with the filing of the necessary paperwork.” Policy arguments, seconded by powerful amici like the Recording Industry Association of America, argued that copyright owners need to be able to go to court quickly.

Peter K. Stris, who argued for Wall-Street.com LLC, a website that was sued for using Fourth Estate’s articles after a license had lapsed, stated: “There’s no ambiguity in the statute but, rather, a profound dissatisfaction on the part of some stakeholders…the way we address that is we look at the text and we try and determine what it indicates Congress decided.”

Time will tell how the Supreme Court rules on this issue.

Fourth Estate is represented by Aaron M. Panner of Kellogg Hansen Todd Figel & Frederick PLLC.

Wall-Street.com is represented by Peter K. Stris of Stris & Maher LLP.

The United States is represented by Solicitor General Noel J. Francisco, Jonathan Y. Ellis and other attorneys from the U.S. Department of Justice and the U.S. Copyright Office.

The case is Fourth Estate Public Benefit Corp. v. Wall-Street.com LLC et al., case number 17-571, at the Supreme Court of the United States.

* Lowe & Associates (“The Firm”) is a boutique entertainment and business litigation firm located in Beverly Hills, California. The Firm has extensive experience handling cases involving entertainment law, having provided top quality legal services to its clients since 1991. The Firm is recognized in multiple publications for its many achievements and high ethical standards, including Martindale-Hubbell and Super Lawyers.

Find us at our website at www.LoweLaw.com

You may also like…

Original ‘Road House’ Writer Sues Amazon Over Remake

Original ‘Road House’ Writer Sues Amazon Over Remake

On February 27, 2024, the writer of the 1989 film ‘Road House’ sued Amazon Studios, LLC, in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. R. Lance Hill, also known as David Lee Henry, alleges that Amazon ignored his copyright for the screenplay and rushed to finish the film by using artificial intelligence before he was able to complete the termination of his original assignment to United Artists under Section 203 of the Copyright Act.

Defend Your Creative Legacy

In the realm of entertainment, your creative property isn’t just a product, it’s a piece of your soul, a testament to your passion, dedication, and vision.

At Lowe & Associates, we understand that, and we’re here to fiercely protect what’s rightfully yours. If you find yourself needing to defend your intellectual property, don’t stand alone. Team up with experts who have consistently showcased their ability to champion creative rights against all odds.

Are you ready to fight for your creative property?

Reach out to us today and let’s ensure your legacy remains untarnished.